What Happens When Presidents "Fess Up"?

(article originally published in Quad City Times blog Historian on the Move)

Wednesday, December 5th, 2007 by Dr.Art Pitz

Yesterday while I was waiting for an appointment, I caught a bit of President Bush's press conference regarding the recent National Intelligence Estimate which indicated that Iran responded to international pressure by shutting down its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and has kept it shut down.In his statements and responses to questions, President Bush did not in any way indicate that his policy towards Iran had been based on an incorrect assumption.

He dodged all questions about that and emphasized instead that Iran had had a nuclear weapons program and could start it up again at any time. That's true, but he didn't admit that his administration's drumbeat for war with Iran might well have been in error.

The record of Presidents failing to admit error and accept responsibility is not encouraging. Would the republic not have been better off if Presidents such as Bill Clinton, Richard Nixon, and Eisenhower (the U-2 episode comes to mind) had promptly faced up to their mistakes publicly? Weren't we better off because President JFK did that with the Bay of Pigs episode?

What do you think? Can you come up with examples both good and bad in the line of Presidents failing to "fess up" and of those who did? In the next few days, we'll take a look at some lessons from the historical record.

[top]  [article list] [home]